Claude Opus 5.5

Also searched as: opus 5.5 comparison

AnthropicCoding model7 posts

Every Claude Opus 5.5 comparison on aivs.tv: 5 side-by-side posts from X against other models on the same prompt, plus 2 solo runs on classic topics, 2 with cost or time reported. Compare coding ability, cost and speed from real tests.

Posts

7incl. 2 solo runs

Summary

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) appears in 7 posts on aivs.tv, next to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, GPT-6.1 Sol, Gemini 4 Argon, GPT-6 Astra, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5. Tasks: pelican riding a bicycle SVG, webGPU ocean in a 61 KB HTML file, jelly Rubik's cube, night train 3D scene, interactive holographic CD, Mario Kart-style racing game and 1 more. Reported for Claude Opus 5.5: 30 min in @jurlycat's webGPU ocean in a 61 KB HTML file and $11.10 / 1 h 23 min in @0xRhinoX's jelly Rubik's cube. According to @0xRhinoX, only Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jelly. (The author’s view.)

What each post reports for Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostTimeCostTokensAuthor’s verdictOriginal
Pelican riding a bicycle SVG@xiangxiang103————X post
WebGPU ocean in a 61 KB HTML file@jurlycat30 min———X post
Jelly Rubik's cube@0xRhinoX1 h 23 min$11.10—Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jellyX post
Night train 3D scene@EnvolDev————X post
Interactive holographic CD@kinderlayer————X post
Mario Kart-style racing game@LuminaBench————X post
Procedural Three.js rocket launch@IToropitsin————X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Who won where

1
  • Jelly Rubik's cubeOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jelly.— the author’s view, @0xRhinoX (paraphrased)

Matchups with Claude Opus 5.5

6

Spellings we map to Claude Opus 5.5

“Opus 5.5”, “Opus5.5”, “claude-opus-5-5”