aivs.tv

Harness comparisonAI Coding

3D anatomical heart, Devin vs Droid — Devin vs Droid

0:00 / 0:20
Video byMads@Laz01L · originally posted on X
View original post on X

3 likes153 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DevinCognitionGemini 4 Argon
    Author’s pick
    Time
    8.2 min
    • Effort high
    • Top
  2. DroidFactoryGemini 4 Argon
    Time
    19 min
    • Effort high
    • Bottom; about 19 minutes

Prompt

3D anatomical heart, Devin vs DroidThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
I like Devin’s result more; Droid seemed to have latency issues today.

@Laz01L’s view (paraphrased)

Harness comparison: Gemini 4 Argon (high) gets the same prompt for a 3D anatomical heart in Devin and in Droid. Devin took 8m 11s, Droid about 19 minutes; the author prefers the Devin result and suspects Droid had latency issues that day.

Same model in every harness: Gemini 4 Argon. More Devin vs Droid. All harness comparisons.

The post, itemised

Task
3D anatomical heart, Devin vs Droid
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
20 s
Likes
3
Views
153
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Devin 8m 11s, Droid about 19 minutes. An Opus 5.5 run in Droid aborted after 2,407 s of reasoning.

Related

Gemini 4 Argon

Content belongs to its creators. Video by @Laz01L; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal

More with these models