AI Coding
Pelican on a bicycle, Flash vs Flash 1017 in OpenCode — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Scoreboard2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekOpenCode
- Time
- 9.4 min
- Cost
- $0.06
- Top clip; 101,074 tokens
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekOpenCode
- Time
- 22.9 min
- Cost
- $0.08
- Bottom clip; 146,791 tokens
Pelican on a bicycle, Flash vs Flash 1017 in OpenCodeThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
Calls the 1017 gains in cost, tokens and time a pretty impressive improvement.
@rubenssoto_ai’s view (paraphrased)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 run the same pelican-on-a-bicycle animation test in OpenCode via OpenRouter. Per the post, 1017 was 25% cheaper, used 31% fewer tokens and finished 59% faster.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Pelican on a bicycle, Flash vs Flash 1017 in OpenCode
- Category
- Animations/SVG
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 30 s
- Likes
- 129
- Views
- 7,047
- Bookmarks
- 7
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.06, 101,074 tokens, 9 min 26 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.08, 146,791 tokens, 22 min 53 s. Provider DeepSeek via OpenRouter, both in OpenCode.
Related
Content belongs to its creators. Video by @rubenssoto_ai; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal


