AI Coding

Pelican on a bicycle, Flash vs Flash 1017 in OpenCode — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Video byRubens Soto | AI & SaaS@rubenssoto_ai · originally posted on X
View original post on X

129 likes7,047 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekOpenCode
    Time
    9.4 min
    Cost
    $0.06
    • Top clip; 101,074 tokens
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekOpenCode
    Time
    22.9 min
    Cost
    $0.08
    • Bottom clip; 146,791 tokens

Pelican on a bicycle, Flash vs Flash 1017 in OpenCodeThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
Calls the 1017 gains in cost, tokens and time a pretty impressive improvement.

@rubenssoto_ai’s view (paraphrased)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 run the same pelican-on-a-bicycle animation test in OpenCode via OpenRouter. Per the post, 1017 was 25% cheaper, used 31% fewer tokens and finished 59% faster.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Pelican on a bicycle, Flash vs Flash 1017 in OpenCode
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
30 s
Likes
129
Views
7,047
Bookmarks
7
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.06, 101,074 tokens, 9 min 26 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.08, 146,791 tokens, 22 min 53 s. Provider DeepSeek via OpenRouter, both in OpenCode.

Related

Content belongs to its creators. Video by @rubenssoto_ai; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal

More with these models