Video Models
Realistic talking selfie, Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0 — Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0
Scoreboard2
- Seedance 2.5ByteDance
- Cost
- $1.44
- First clip (“left”); 24 fps
- Wan 3.0AlibabaAuthor’s pick
- Cost
- $0.80
- Second clip (“right”); 60 fps
Prompt
Realistic talking selfie, Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0The post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
Wan is nearly half the price, smoother at 60 fps and looks more realistic.
@sixugc’s view (paraphrased)
Seedance 2.5 (first clip, $1.44) and Wan 3.0 (second clip, $0.80) each make a realistic selfie-style video of a woman talking to camera. The author says Wan looks more realistic and runs at 60 fps versus 24.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Realistic talking selfie, Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0
- Category
- Video Models
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 6.8 s (+1 more clip)
- Likes
- 8
- Views
- 296
- Bookmarks
- 3
- Sponsored
- No
NotesThe post doesn’t say whether both clips used the same prompt.
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Seedance 2.5 $1.44; Wan 3.0 $0.80.
Related
Posted by @sixugc on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
