Harness comparisonBenchmark: GLASS CATHEDRAL by @AlicanKiraz0AI Coding

GLASS CATHEDRAL fracture benchmark, four harnesses — Pi vs Droid vs OpenAI Codex vs OMP

0:00 / 1:17
Pi (top left)
Posted byAlican Kiraz@AlicanKiraz0 · on X
View post on X

40 likes1,772 views

GPT-6 Luna at high effort runs the GLASS CATHEDRAL fracture benchmark in Pi, OMP, Droid and Codex CLI: three Gothic stained-glass windows, 150–200 breakable glass fragments with XPBD constraints, in one HTML file.

Same model in every harness: GPT-6 Luna. More OpenAI Codex vs Pi. All harness comparisons.

The post, itemised

Task
GLASS CATHEDRAL fracture benchmark, four harnesses
Category
Simulations
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
77.5 s
Likes
40
Views
1,772
Bookmarks
8
Sponsored
No

NotesScores out of 10 from GPT-6 Astra Pro as judge LLM. Planning-first, then development, in every tool.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Droid $0.17, 15 min; Pi $0.15, 42 min; Codex CLI $0.34, 24 min; OMP $0.83, 1 h 17 min.

Related

Posted by @AlicanKiraz0 on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models