aivs.tv

AI Coding

Pelican Mafia: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, OpenCode vs API — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

0:00 / 1:18
Posted byVulKan@VulKan42069 · on X
View post on X

31 likes985 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekOpenCodeGo plan
    Time
    1 h 35 min
    • Effort Max
    • Clips labelled “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash - Max (OpenCode Go)”; 5041 lines, 32.6M tokens
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    41.2 min
    • Effort Max
    • Environment DeepSeek official API
    • Clips labelled “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash - Max (DS Platform API)”; 5369 lines, 33.6M tokens

Prompt

Pelican Mafia: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, OpenCode vs APIThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Harness comparison: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on Max takes the author’s Pelican Mafia Test in OpenCode Go (5041 lines, 32.6M tokens, 1h 35m) and through the DeepSeek API (5369 lines, 33.6M tokens, 41m 10s).

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Pelican Mafia: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, OpenCode vs API
Category
Games
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
78.1 s
Likes
31
Views
985
Bookmarks
2
Sponsored
No

NotesSame model on both sides, so this compares OpenCode Go with the official DeepSeek API. The author says OpenCode reports serving the 1017 update, yet the output quality gap is large. Liked by @aivstv.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: OpenCode Go 1h 35m, 32.6M tokens, 5041 lines; DeepSeek API 41m 10s, 33.6M tokens, 5369 lines. Cost not stated.

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Posted by @VulKan42069 on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models