aivs.tv

AI Coding

3D cargo ship in a storm, then self-fix from screenshots — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

0:00 / 0:31
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (top)
Posted byCryptoBandit@CryptoBandit100 · on X
View post on X

1 likes140 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    12.5 min
    • Environment Local (3× DGX Spark + GN100)
    • medium confidence
    • Top; build 12m 31s at 89.6 tok/s
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” and run locally after the 1017 update; the weights version isn’t stated.
  2. GLM 5.3 FlashZhipu AI (Z.ai)
    Time
    2.9 min
    • Environment Local (3× DGX Spark + GN100)
    • Bottom; build 2m 51s at 130.2 tok/s

Prompt

3D cargo ship in a storm, then self-fix from screenshotsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (top) and GLM 5.3 Flash (bottom) get the same prompt on the same four local machines: build a 3D cargo ship in a storm, then fix it from screenshots of their own work.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
3D cargo ship in a storm, then self-fix from screenshots
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
31.8 s
Likes
1
Views
140
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

NotesNo winner named; the author asks which one readers would ship.

Cost & time, as stated in the postShown in the video: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash build 12m 31s at 89.6 tok/s, GLM 5.3 Flash build 2m 51s at 130.2 tok/s, both $0 (local).

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Posted by @CryptoBandit100 on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models