aivs.tv

AI Coding

Mars colony in a dust storm, run locally — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

0:00 / 0:20
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (top)
Posted byCryptoBandit@CryptoBandit100 · on X
View post on X

0 likes58 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    23 min
    • medium confidence
    • Top; local; shader bug fixed on a second pass
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.
  2. GLM 5.3 FlashZhipu AI (Z.ai)
    Time
    13 min
    • Bottom; local; clean build

Prompt

Mars colony in a dust storm, run locallyThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

GLM 5.3 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash run on the author’s own hardware with one prompt for a living 3D Mars colony in a dust storm.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Mars colony in a dust storm, run locally
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
20 s
Likes
0
Views
58
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

NotesNot a controlled comparison: DeepSeek needed a second pass. The author asks which you would run.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek about 23 min, GLM about 13 min, both on local hardware.

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Posted by @CryptoBandit100 on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models