aivs.tv

AI Coding

3D pelican on a bicycle, GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol — GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:06
GPT-6.1 Terra (top)
Posted by@YxzRainy@YxzRainy · on X
View post on X

15 likes6,928 views

Scoreboard2

  1. GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
    Time
    7.5 min
    Tokens
    5.3M
    • Effort Max
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Author’s pick
    Time
    25.5 min
    Tokens
    6.5M
    • Effort Max

Prompt

3D pelican on a bicycle, GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 SolThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says Sol looks much better, while Terra was over 3x faster and about 55% cheaper.

@YxzRainy’s view (paraphrased)

GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) and GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) get the same prompt to build a 3D pelican riding a bicycle in Three.js; Terra is the top clip and Sol the bottom one.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
3D pelican on a bicycle, GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
6.9 s
Likes
15
Views
6,928
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (estimated at API prices): GPT-6.1 Terra 7 min 32 s, 5.323M tokens, about ¥4.35; GPT-6.1 Sol 25 min 29 s, 6.493M tokens, about ¥9.60. Terra used 19% of the Plus 5-hour quota, Sol 24%.

Related

GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Posted by @YxzRainy on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models