LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
- Author picksLongCat 2.51–0
- CheaperLongCat 2.51/1 postsmedian gap ~2.9×
As stated in each post, not a controlled benchmark.
Posts
1
About this matchup
LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max: which is better for coding?
Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.5 or Qwen 3.8 Max?
Author picks: where the author preferred one of the two, they picked LongCat 2.5 once and Qwen 3.8 Max never. That covers 1 of the 1 post here; each post is a different task, so watch the outputs above for the work you care about.
Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.5 or Qwen 3.8 Max?
1 post states a cost for both: LongCat 2.5 was cheaper in it (~2.9× cheaper). These are the costs the posts state for each run, not list prices.
What have LongCat 2.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max been tested on?
The most-viewed of the 1 post: browser game build, LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max (@omarsar0). Categories: Games.
Summary
LongCat 2.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max appear together in 1 post on X: browser game build, LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max (@omarsar0). In @omarsar0's browser game build, LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max, LongCat 2.5 was cheaper ($0.28 vs $0.82), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Author’s verdict | Post |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Browser game build, LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max@omarsar0 | LongCat 2.5 | — | $0.28 | — | Author’s pick | X post |
| Browser game build, LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max@omarsar0 | Qwen 3.8 Max | — | $0.82 | — | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Who won where
1- Browser game build, LongCat 2.5 vs Qwen 3.8 MaxLongCat-2.5 got it done nearly 3x cheaper and looks like a strong option for full app builds.— the author’s view, @omarsar0 (paraphrased)