Muse Spark Open
aka Muse-Spark-Open-816B-A42B
MetaCoding model3 posts
Posts
3
About Muse Spark Open
Every Muse Spark Open comparison on aivs.tv: 3 side-by-side posts from X against other models on the same prompt, 2 with cost or time reported. Compare coding ability, cost and speed from real tests.
Record against each opponent
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper than Muse Spark Open in 1 of 1 post that reports costs for both.
| Opponent | Posts | Cheaper | Faster | Author picks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 1 | 0/1 | — | 0–1 |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 1 | 1/1 | — | — |
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash | 1 | 0/1 | — | — |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 1 | 0/1 | — | — |
| Kimi K3 | 1 | 1/1 | — | — |
From 3 posts; costs and times as stated by each author, not a controlled benchmark.
Summary
Muse Spark Open (Meta) appears in 3 posts on aivs.tv, next to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, MiniMax M3.1 Flash, Kimi K3.1 Pro, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL. Tasks: ant colony foraging benchmark, four models, retro space shooter and BuildingBench: Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL. Reported for Muse Spark Open: $0.206 in @AlicanKiraz0's ant colony foraging benchmark, four models and $0.027 in @alexfacethesun's retro space shooter.
What each post reports for Muse Spark Open
| Post | Time | Cost | Tokens | Author’s verdict | Post |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ant colony foraging benchmark, four models@AlicanKiraz0 | — | $0.206 | — | The poster ranks DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 first overall; Muse Spark Open made 0 deliveries across all four seeds. | X post |
| Retro space shooter@alexfacethesun | — | $0.027 | — | They say Muse Spark Open built the best-looking game, but DeepSeek V4.1 Flash followed the brief better for a third of the price; Kimi K3 repeated its waves and was the most expensive run | X post |
| BuildingBench: Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL@EnactraAI | — | — | — | Muse Spark Open scores higher (56.9 vs 37.8) while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is among the cheapest tested; neither newcomer reaches the cost–quality frontier. | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Who won where
3- Ant colony foraging benchmark, four modelsThe poster ranks DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 first overall; Muse Spark Open made 0 deliveries across all four seeds.— the author’s view, @AlicanKiraz0 (paraphrased)
- Retro space shooterThey say Muse Spark Open built the best-looking game, but DeepSeek V4.1 Flash followed the brief better for a third of the price; Kimi K3 repeated its waves and was the most expensive run.— the author’s view, @alexfacethesun (paraphrased)
- BuildingBench: Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMuse Spark Open scores higher (56.9 vs 37.8) while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is among the cheapest tested; neither newcomer reaches the cost–quality frontier.— the author’s view, @EnactraAI (paraphrased)
Matchups with Muse Spark Open
6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark Open1 post · 8K viewsKimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark Open1 post · 8K viewsMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open1 post · 8K viewsMuse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL1 post · 1.3K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open1 post · 20 viewsKimi K3 vs Muse Spark Open1 post · 20 views
Spellings we map to Muse Spark Open
“MuseSparkOpen”, “Muse-Spark-Open-816B-A42B”