Benchmark: BuildingBench by @EnactraAIAI Coding
BuildingBench: Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL — Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Scoreboard2
- Muse Spark OpenMetaClaude Code
- Effort max
- BuildingBench score 56.9 as stated; label “Muse Spark Open (max)”
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIAClaude Code
- Effort max
- BuildingBench score 37.8 as stated; label “Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (max)”
Prompt
BuildingBench: Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
Muse Spark Open scores higher (56.9 vs 37.8) while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is among the cheapest tested; neither newcomer reaches the cost–quality frontier.
@EnactraAI’s view (paraphrased)
Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, both at max effort in Claude Code, rebuild real buildings in 3D from photographs on Enactra’s BuildingBench; the GIF shows both builds per building plus the score and cost charts.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- BuildingBench: Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Category
- 3D & Shaders
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Likes
- 17
- Views
- 1,250
- Bookmarks
- 2
- Sponsored
- No
NotesPosted by Enactra, the benchmark’s maker. Scores are BuildingBench overall; the post also cites other models’ scores that are not in the GIF.
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: estimated median cost per task $8.59 (Muse Spark Open) and $0.76 (Nemotron 3.5 Super VL). Time not stated.
Related
Posted by @EnactraAI on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
