Same model over timeSingle-run anecdoteAI Coding
Stained-glass hibiscus — Claude Opus 5.5 (Sep 30) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Oct 3)
Scoreboard2
- Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
- Effort Extra
- Written as “Opus 5.5”
- Top, labelled “Opus 5.5 Extra, September 30, 2026”
- Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
- Effort Extra
- Written as “Opus 5.5”
- Bottom, labelled “Opus 5.5 Extra, October 3, 2026”
Prompt
Stained-glass hibiscusThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
They point to visibly different petals from the same prompt on Sep 30 and Oct 3, ask whether Opus 5.5 got nerfed or improved, and don't pick a better run.
@ivanainai’s view (paraphrased)
Claude Opus 5.5 builds a stained-glass hibiscus from the exact same prompt on Sep 30 and on Oct 3, stacked top and bottom. The author asks whether the model got nerfed or improved and points to the difference in the petals.
Same model, same prompt, run on different dates: one sample each, not a controlled test. Model outputs vary from run to run, so the poster’s claim is not verified here. All same-model-over-time posts.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Stained-glass hibiscus
- Category
- 3D & Shaders
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 60 s
- Likes
- 825
- Views
- 242,991
- Bookmarks
- 198
- Sponsored
- No
Related
Posted by @ivanainai on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
