aivs.tv

AI Coding

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

3D character customizer with sound

0:00 / 0:56
Video byMarcel@marcthecreatorr · originally posted on XView original post on X

143 likes163,398 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Author’s pick
    Time
    20 min
    Cost
    $6.00
    • Effort xhigh
    • Top. Approx.
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    1 h
    Cost
    $0.23
    • Effort Max
    • Bottom. Approx.

Prompt

3D character customizer with soundThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
Opus really cooked, while deepseek got pretty close with a few errors, decent for a cheap flash model.

@marcthecreatorr’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh, top) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max, bottom) build a 3D character customizer from the same prompt. The author praises Opus’s animation, sound and detail; DeepSeek came close with a few errors.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
3D character customizer with sound
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
56.8 s
Likes
143
Views
163,398
Bookmarks
36
Sponsored
No

Related

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Content belongs to its creators. Video by @marcthecreatorr; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal

More with these models