aivs.tv

AI Coding

Octopus folding laundry — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5

0:00 / 0:20
Video bybenji 💵@benjistacked · originally posted on X
View original post on X

53 likes11,984 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    22 min
    • Effort max
    • Top; 22 minutes, $0
  2. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    15 min
    • Effort high
    • Bottom; 15 minutes, $2.20

Prompt

Octopus folding laundryThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
They built almost the same room, but only one of them cost $2.20..

@benjistacked’s view (paraphrased)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max, top) and Claude Opus 5.5 (high, bottom) get the same prompt: an octopus folding laundry in a cozy room. The author pitches it as a new benchmark; both built almost the same room.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Octopus folding laundry
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
20 s
Likes
53
Views
11,984
Bookmarks
12
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek 22 min, $0; Opus 15 min, $2.20.

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Content belongs to its creators. Video by @benjistacked; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal

More with these models