AI Coding
3D moon landing in five stages — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Scoreboard2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
- Time
- 1 h
- Cost
- $1.00
- medium confidence
- Written as “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (no “1017”)”
- Top
- Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” in a post from Oct 18, 2026 or later; DeepSeek upgraded V4.1 Flash to 1017 on Oct 17.
- Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
- Time
- 2 h
- Cost
- $12.00
- Bottom
Prompt
3D moon landing in five stagesThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
DeepSeek’s ignition steam is stronger, while Opus’s orbital sunrise and moon surface feel more like a documentary.
@_littlemandarin’s view (paraphrased)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Claude Opus 5.5 build the same five-stage 3D moon landing. DeepSeek took 1 hour and $1, Opus 2 hours and $12. Both finished all five stages; the author prefers Opus’s orbital sunrise and lunar surface.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- 3D moon landing in five stages
- Category
- 3D & Shaders
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 20 s
- Likes
- 1
- Views
- 168
- Bookmarks
- 0
- Sponsored
- No
Related
Content belongs to its creators. Video by @_littlemandarin; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal
