aivs.tv

AI Coding

Mechanical skeleton watch, DeepSeek vs GPT-6.1 Sol — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:51
Posted by@YxzRainy@YxzRainy · on X
View post on X

19 likes1,386 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Author’s pick
    • Effort max
    • Labelled "Deppseek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max"
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    • Effort max
    • Labelled "GPT-6.1 Sol Max"

Prompt

Topic · Mechanical watch (3D)

Mechanical skeleton watch, DeepSeek vs GPT-6.1 SolThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
DeepSeek nails the matte metal, gear detail, mechanism and lighting; GPT is decent but its metal looks worse and many gears do not turn.

@YxzRainy’s view (paraphrased)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-6.1 Sol, both at max, each build a 3D mechanical skeleton watch with moving gears, shown in alternating close-ups and exploded views.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Mechanical skeleton watch, DeepSeek vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
51.1 s
Likes
19
Views
1,386
Bookmarks
3
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: the DeepSeek build cost about ¥3 (¥2.7, per the author’s reply). No cost given for GPT-6.1 Sol.

Related

Topic: Mechanical watch (3D)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @YxzRainy on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models