AI Coding
Pelican driving a roadster, 3 models via AI/ML API — Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5.5
Scoreboard3
- Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
- Time
- 8.6 min
- Cost
- —
- Environment AI/ML API
- Top clip; 121.5K tokens; author: funniest wing-flap animation
- GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
- Time
- 15 min
- Cost
- $2.90
- Environment AI/ML API
- Middle clip; 1.07M tokens
- Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
- Time
- 57.4 min
- Cost
- $8.37
- Environment AI/ML API
- Bottom clip; 9.79M tokens
Pelican driving a roadster, 3 models via AI/ML APIThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
Asks whether Opus is worth about 30x the price when Gemini made the funniest wing flap.
@noclipepe’s view (paraphrased)
Gemini 4 Argon, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 run the same pelican-driving-a-roadster animation task through AI/ML API. Gemini was fastest and cheapest by far, and the author loves its wing-flap animation.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Pelican driving a roadster, 3 models via AI/ML API
- Category
- Animations/SVG
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 23.8 s
- Likes
- 16
- Views
- 599
- Bookmarks
- 8
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postGemini 4 Argon: 8 min 33 s, 121.5K tokens, listed at $0.68 though the post later says it cost 28 cents. GPT-6 Astra: 14 min 58 s, 1.07M tokens, $2.90. Claude Opus 5.5: 57 min 21 s, 9.79M tokens, $8.37.
Related
Content belongs to its creators. Video by @noclipepe; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal
