aivs.tv

AI Coding

Interactive ferrofluid simulation in Three.js — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:20
Posted byOlezhka@olezhavich · on X
View post on X

4 likes260 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Author’s pick
    Time
    25.3 min
    Cost
    $8.50
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    28.9 min
    Cost
    $1.32

Prompt

Interactive ferrofluid simulation in Three.jsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
Opus made the liquid look far more realistic; the author picks Opus for the liquid and Sol for the price.

@olezhavich’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol get the same prompt, one try each, for an interactive ferrofluid simulation in Three.js. Opus ran 25m 19s for an estimated $8.50, Sol 28m 56s for $1.32.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Interactive ferrofluid simulation in Three.js
Category
Simulations
Mode
One shot
Posted
Video length
20.9 s
Likes
4
Views
260
Bookmarks
2
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postEstimated API prices as stated: Opus 25m 19s, $8.50; Sol 28m 56s, $1.32.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @olezhavich on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models