aivs.tv

AI Coding

Interactive 3D hourglass in Three.js — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:23
Posted byOlezhka@olezhavich · on X
View post on X

1 likes29 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Author’s pick
    Time
    24.6 min
    Cost
    $5.79
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    28.1 min
    Cost
    $1.94

Prompt

Interactive 3D hourglass in Three.jsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
Prefers Opus visually, but Sol delivered a clean result for roughly a third of the price.

@olezhavich’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol get the same prompt for an interactive 3D hourglass in Three.js. The author describes Opus’s as a classic wooden hourglass with glass reflections and Sol’s as minimal dark green and gold.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Interactive 3D hourglass in Three.js
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
23.8 s
Likes
1
Views
29
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postEstimated API prices as stated: Opus 24m 36s, $5.79; Sol 28m 5s, $1.94.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @olezhavich on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models