Harness comparisonAI Coding
DeepSeek 1017 in DeepSeek Harness vs OpenCode — DeepSeek Harness vs OpenCode
Scoreboard2
- Time
- 1 h 57 min
- Cost
- $0.72
- Effort max
- medium confidence
- Top: 99.8% cache, ~69 avg tokens/s
- Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.
- Time
- 3 h 33 min
- Cost
- $1.22
- Effort max
- medium confidence
- Bottom: 98.1% cache, ~57 avg tokens/s
- Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.
Prompt
DeepSeek 1017 in DeepSeek Harness vs OpenCodeThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at max runs the same build in DeepSeek Harness (top) and OpenCode (bottom). DeepSeek Harness took 1h57m, 134.7M tokens and $0.72; OpenCode took 3h33m, 143.9M tokens and $1.22.
Same model in every harness: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. More DeepSeek Harness vs OpenCode. All harness comparisons.
The post, itemised
- Task
- DeepSeek 1017 in DeepSeek Harness vs OpenCode
- Category
- 3D & Shaders
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 48 s
- Likes
- 4
- Views
- 306
- Bookmarks
- 1
- Sponsored
- No
NotesNumbers only; no winner named.
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek Harness 1h57m, 134.7M tokens, $0.72; OpenCode 3h33m, 143.9M tokens, $1.22.
Related
Posted by @beyondwudan on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
