aivs.tv

AI Coding

Lyrics music video with beat sync, 19× cost gap — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5

0:00 / 0:33
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (top)
Posted by@xuxufuye@xuxufuye · on X
View post on X

0 likes9 views

Scoreboard2

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    32 min
    Cost
    —
    • Top; ¥1.93
  2. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    25 min
    Cost
    $5.04
    • Bottom

Prompt

Lyrics music video with beat sync, 19× cost gapThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Claude Opus 5.5 each make a lyrics music video from the same prompt, one run each with no code changes; visuals, animation and beat sync are all written by the models.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Lyrics music video with beat sync, 19× cost gap
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
33.8 s
Likes
0
Views
9
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

NotesNo winner named.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek ¥1.93, 32 min; Opus $5.04 (about ¥36), 25 min, nearly 19× the cost.

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Posted by @xuxufuye on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models