aivs.tv

AI Coding

Working hydraulic excavator in Three.js, Opus vs Sol — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:23
Claude Opus 5.5 (top)
Posted byOlezhka@olezhavich · on X
View post on X

3 likes177 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Author’s pick
    Time
    29.4 min
    Cost
    $7.27
    • Top
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    18.6 min
    Cost
    $1.08
    • Bottom

Prompt

Working hydraulic excavator in Three.js, Opus vs SolThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
Prefers Opus for the mechanical detail, but Sol delivered a complete-looking scene for almost 7x less.

@olezhavich’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol get the same prompt: a working 3D hydraulic excavator in Three.js. Opus made a detailed close-up machine with a cinematic presentation; Sol built a clean miniature construction scene.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Working hydraulic excavator in Three.js, Opus vs Sol
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
23.3 s
Likes
3
Views
177
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (estimated API prices): Claude Opus 5.5 29 min 26 s, $7.27; GPT-6.1 Sol 18 min 35 s, $1.08.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @olezhavich on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models