aivs.tv

AI Coding

Interactive 3D jet engine cutaway, three models — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:28
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (top)
Posted byOlezhka@olezhavich · on X
View post on X

20 likes992 views

Scoreboard3

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Author’s pick
    Time
    1 h 30 min
    • Top; the author says it burned a huge amount of tokens
  2. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    1 h 20 min
    • Middle
  3. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    26.9 min
    • Bottom

Prompt

Interactive 3D jet engine cutaway, three modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 surprised the author with detailed internals and a polished cutaway; Claude Opus 5.5 had strong visuals; GPT-6.1 Sol was fastest but less ambitious.

@olezhavich’s view (paraphrased)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol each build an interactive 3D jet engine cutaway in Three.js from the same prompt.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Interactive 3D jet engine cutaway, three models
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
28.8 s
Likes
20
Views
992
Bookmarks
5
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 about 1 h 30 min; Claude Opus 5.5 1 h 19 min 33 s; GPT-6.1 Sol 26 min 57 s.

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolCompare all 3 modelsClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @olezhavich on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models