AI Coding
Rubik’s cube that scrambles and solves itself — Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Scoreboard2
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicAuthor’s pick
- Time
- 13 min
- Cost
- $2.40
- Top
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- Time
- 60 s
- Cost
- $0.02
- Bottom; the cube is only two layers tall
Rubik’s cube that scrambles and solves itselfThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
Claude Opus 5.5 turned real layers and landed on clean solid faces; Claude Haiku 5.5’s two-layer cube slid pieces out of place mid-turn.
@buzzhive_ai’s view (paraphrased)
Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 get one shot each at a 15-second 3D scene: a Rubik’s cube on a dark wooden desk scrambles itself with real layer turns, then solves itself move by move.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Rubik’s cube that scrambles and solves itself
- Category
- 3D & Shaders, Animations/SVG
- Mode
- One shot
- Posted
- Video length
- 15 s
- Likes
- 12
- Views
- 344
- Bookmarks
- 5
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Claude Opus 5.5 13 min, $2.40; Claude Haiku 5.5 1 min, 2 cents.
Related
Posted by @buzzhive_ai on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal


