aivs.tv

AI Coding

Futuristic cyberpunk city in Three.js — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:25
Claude Opus 5.5 (top)
Posted byOlezhka@olezhavich · on X
View post on X

10 likes385 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Author’s pick
    Time
    38.2 min
    Cost
    $12.48
    • Top
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    21.3 min
    Cost
    $1.88
    • Bottom

Prompt

Futuristic cyberpunk city in Three.jsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The author prefers Claude Opus 5.5’s massive, dense neon city, but says GPT-6.1 Sol’s darker, minimal take looks great for almost 7x less.

@olezhavich’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol get the same prompt to build a futuristic cyberpunk city in Three.js and come back with two very different looks.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Futuristic cyberpunk city in Three.js
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
25.8 s
Likes
10
Views
385
Bookmarks
3
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (estimated API prices): Claude Opus 5.5 38 min 13 s, $12.48; GPT-6.1 Sol 21 min 19 s, $1.88.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @olezhavich on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models