aivs.tv

AI Coding

Browsable WebGL witch and candy house world — Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

0:00 / 0:12
Claude Opus 5.5 (top)
Posted byOne2x Datalab@One2xDatalab · on X
View post on X

0 likes2 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    6.5 min
    Cost
    $1.34
    • Top; 7 turns
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    28.3 min
    Cost
    $0.72
    • medium confidence
    • Bottom; hit the 40-turn cap
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.

Prompt

Browsable WebGL witch and candy house worldThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 run as agents on one brief to build a browsable WebGL world with a witch and a candy house. Both passed 8 browser checks.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Browsable WebGL witch and candy house world
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
12 s
Likes
0
Views
2
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

NotesNo winner named; the author asks which one you would explore first.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (approximate): Claude Opus 5.5 $1.34, 6 min 32 s, 7 turns; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.72, 28 min 18 s, 40-turn cap.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Posted by @One2xDatalab on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models