aivs.tv

AI Coding

Luxury watch landing page, Opus vs DeepSeek 1017 — Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

0:00 / 0:20
Posted byWasim Jalali@WasimJalali · on X
View post on X

1 likes26 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    6.5 min
    Cost
    $1.22
    • High
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    17.5 min
    Cost
    $0.30
    • Max

Prompt

Topic · One-shot landing page

Luxury watch landing page, Opus vs DeepSeek 1017The post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The author ranks DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 second only to Opus for landing pages and asks which page you would buy from.

@WasimJalali’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 on High and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on Max get the same prompt and one try each at a landing page for a luxury watch.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Luxury watch landing page, Opus vs DeepSeek 1017
Category
Web/UI
Mode
One shot
Posted
Video length
20 s
Likes
1
Views
26
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Claude Opus 5.5 $1.22, 6.5 min; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.30, 17.5 min.

Related

Topic: One-shot landing pageClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Posted by @WasimJalali on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models