aivs.tv

AI Coding

Walking castle in 3D, Opus vs Sol — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:20
Sol 6.1 (labelled)
Posted byOlezhka@olezhavich · on X
View post on X

2 likes534 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    36.4 min
    Cost
    $12.53
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    25.1 min
    Cost
    $1.26

Prompt

Walking castle in 3D, Opus vs SolThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The author prefers Opus for its mechanical detail and scale, while noting Sol is nearly 10x cheaper.

@olezhavich’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol get the same prompt and one try each at a castle that walks on mechanical legs through a mountain valley.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Walking castle in 3D, Opus vs Sol
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
One shot
Posted
Video length
20.6 s
Likes
2
Views
534
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (estimated API prices): Claude Opus 5.5 36 min 21 s, $12.53; GPT-6.1 Sol 25 min 7 s, about $1.26.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @olezhavich on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models