aivs.tv

AI Coding

Voxel world, cloud model vs four DGX Sparks — Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

0:00 / 0:27
Posted byNiklas@niklaslenz_ai · on X
View post on X

15 likes1,141 views

Scoreboard2

  1. Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicClaude Code
    Time
    33.2 min
    Cost
    $7.82
    Tokens
    173.2K
    • Lumenfall; about $7.82 at API list prices, run on a subscription; browser check 9.0/10
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    49.7 min
    Cost
    —
    Tokens
    121.7K
    • Environment Local, four DGX Sparks
    • medium confidence
    • Aetherfall; EXL3 4.0 bpw quant on TensorFold; browser check 9.0/10
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.

Prompt

Voxel world, cloud model vs four DGX SparksThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says the two worlds are not far apart in quality.

@niklaslenz_ai’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5 in the cloud and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on four DGX Sparks get the same voxel-world prompt, one try each.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Voxel world, cloud model vs four DGX Sparks
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
One shot
Posted
Video length
27.3 s
Likes
15
Views
1,141
Bookmarks
4
Sponsored
No

NotesThe setups differ: the Sparks ran in a locked test container, Opus in the poster’s own CLI with internet access.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Claude Opus 5.5 33.2 min, 173,159 tokens, about $7.82 at list prices; DeepSeek on four Sparks 49.7 min, 121,707 tokens, no API bill.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Posted by @niklaslenz_ai on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models