aivs.tv

AI Coding

Halloween pumpkin patch, three models — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

0:00 / 0:18
Posted byHavis | Claude Code@HavisT83099 · on X
View post on X

10 likes473 views

Scoreboard3

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    18.5 min
    Cost
    $2.75
  2. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    19.2 min
    Cost
    $0.61
    • medium confidence
    • Named "ChatGPT" in the post; the chat box on screen shows GPT-6.1 Sol
  3. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
    Time
    22 min
    Cost
    $0.54

Prompt

Halloween pumpkin patch, three modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Claude Opus 5.5, ChatGPT (GPT-6.1 Sol on screen) and Kimi K3.1 Pro get the same Halloween prompt, one try each, no edits: a pumpkin patch in Three.js with a scarecrow, a house, a moon, bats and a ghost.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Halloween pumpkin patch, three models
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
18.4 s
Likes
10
Views
473
Bookmarks
6
Sponsored
No

NotesThe poster asks which one made the spookiest pumpkin patch.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs shown on screen: Claude Opus 5.5 18 min 29 s, about $2.75; ChatGPT 19 min 10 s, about $0.61; Kimi K3.1 Pro 22 min, $0.54.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 ProCompare all 3 modelsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Posted by @HavisT83099 on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models