AI Coding
Blender axe, GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 — GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Scoreboard2
- GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIAuthor’s pick
- Time
- 18 min
- Cost
- $0.61
- Tokens
- 4.9M
- Tool Blender
- Effort Max
- Named "Terra 6.1"; 63 model calls; cost estimated at standard API rates
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
- Time
- 1 h 51 min
- Cost
- $1.00
- Tokens
- —
- Tool Blender
- Written "DeepSeek v4.1 Flash"; 402 tool calls, about 19.8K triangles
Prompt
Blender axe, GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017The post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
The poster prefers Terra's axe and says it was roughly 6× faster in these runs.
@sshayahmet’s view (paraphrased)
GPT-6.1 Terra (max effort) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 each model the same axe in Blender; the clips alternate with each model named on screen.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Blender axe, GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- Category
- 3D & Shaders
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 22 s
- Likes
- 1
- Views
- 60
- Bookmarks
- 0
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: GPT-6.1 Terra about 18 min, 4.88M tokens, about $0.61 (estimate); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1 h 51 min, about $1 in logged usage.
Related
Posted by @sshayahmet on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
