DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Terra

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-6.1 Terra appear together in 31 posts on X: voxel bike, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (@filicroval), satellite Mesh Blackout benchmark, four models in OpenCode (@AlicanKiraz0), cheetah sprint, GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (@LatentOperatorX), fake Genie 4 walkable world in one HTML file (@maker_evan), rainy city at night, DeepSeek vs GPT-6.1 Terra (@LatentOperatorX) and 26 more. 16 of them are part of larger lineups with other models. The 5 most-viewed examples: In @YxzRainy's 3D pelican bike ride by the sea, three models, GPT-6.1 Terra was faster (7.5 min vs 1 h 16 min) and used fewer tokens (5.3M tokens vs 69.1M tokens), as reported in the post. In @Vortlyn's Interstellar black hole in three.js, DeepSeek vs Terra, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.17 vs $0.18) and GPT-6.1 Terra was faster (2.5 min vs 34 min), as reported in the post. In @AlicanKiraz0's satellite Mesh Blackout benchmark, four models in OpenCode, GPT-6.1 Terra was cheaper ($0.42 vs $0.47) and faster (10.9 min vs 18.7 min), as reported in the post. In @LatentOperatorX's raccoon animation, GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.06 vs $1.13) and GPT-6.1 Terra was faster (11.7 min vs 15.3 min), as reported in the post. In @LatentOperatorX's dragon attacking a medieval castle, Terra vs DeepSeek, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.05 vs $0.61) and GPT-6.1 Terra was faster (7.4 min vs 8.4 min), as reported in the post. The table below lists all 18 posts with numbers for both.