AI Coding
3D car configurator, GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5 — GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5
Scoreboard2
- GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
- Time
- 9.6 min
- Cost
- $0.40
- Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
- Time
- 2 min
- Cost
- $0.12
Prompt
3D car configurator, GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5The post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
The poster says Terra's UI looks cleaner while Opus finished first: speed versus polish.
@WojakTheDev’s view (paraphrased)
GPT-6.1 Terra and Claude Opus 5.5 get the same prompt for a 3D car configurator page; the clips alternate with each model named on screen.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- 3D car configurator, GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Category
- 3D & Shaders, Web/UI
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 21.3 s
- Likes
- 1
- Views
- 287
- Bookmarks
- 0
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (rough, depends on tokens): GPT-6.1 Terra 9 min 35 s, about $0.40; Claude Opus 5.5 2 min, about $0.12.
Related
Posted by @WojakTheDev on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal


