aivs.tv

AI Coding

Complete 3D house render, three models — GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

0:00 / 0:25
Posted bySerik@sshayahmet · on X
View post on X

2 likes68 views

Scoreboard3

  1. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    31.9 min
    Cost
    $1.26
    Tokens
    3.4M
    • Effort Max
  2. GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
    Time
    10.6 min
    Cost
    $0.61
    Tokens
    4.8M
    • Effort Max
    • First build only
  3. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    3 h 54 min
    Cost
    $3.00
    Tokens
    125.8M
    • Effort Max
    • medium confidence
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.

Prompt

Complete 3D house render, three modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says Sol gave the best result straight away, Terra was fastest but cut corners, and DeepSeek’s solid work wasn’t worth the nearly 4-hour wait.

@sshayahmet’s view (paraphrased)

GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6.1 Terra and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, all on max, each build a complete 3D house render with exterior, lighting, UI and interior rooms.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Complete 3D house render, three models
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
25 s
Likes
2
Views
68
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated (estimated API cost): GPT-6.1 Sol 31 min 56 s, 3.44M tokens, about $1.26; GPT-6.1 Terra first build 10 min 35 s, 4.81M tokens, about $0.61; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (OpenCode Go) 3 h 54 min, 125.79M tokens, $3.00.

Related

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Compare all 3 modelsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Posted by @sshayahmet on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models