AI Coding
Mechanical jaw in the 3D X-ray test — Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
Scoreboard3
- Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle
- Time
- 29.1 min
- Cost
- $2.93
- Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
- Time
- 35.3 min
- Cost
- $7.07
- GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
- Time
- 26.1 min
- Cost
- $6.76
Prompt
Mechanical jaw in the 3D X-ray testThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
The poster rates Carbon 10/10 for detail, Opus 5.5 9.0 for the most realistic mechanism and Astra 8.5 for its gold denture.
@noclipepe’s view (paraphrased)
Gemini 4 Carbon, Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra get the same prompt: a mechanical jaw for the poster’s 3D X-ray test, with every tooth moving on its own.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Mechanical jaw in the 3D X-ray test
- Category
- 3D & Shaders
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 33.8 s
- Likes
- 46
- Views
- 2,907
- Bookmarks
- 17
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Carbon 29m 9s, $2.93; Opus 5.5 35m 17s, $7.07; GPT-6 Astra 26m 7s, $6.76.
Related
Posted by @noclipepe on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
