AI Coding

Halloween FPS corridor, DeepSeek vs Argon vs Opus — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5

0:00 / 0:12
Posted byOne2x Datalab@One2xDatalab · on X
View post on X

4 likes147 views

Scoreboard3

  1. Cost
    $0.66
    • medium confidence
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.
  2. Cost
    $1.79
  3. Cost
    $5.64

Prompt

Halloween FPS corridor, DeepSeek vs Argon vs OpusThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says DeepSeek built the best atmosphere, Argon was the best value with stronger modelling and motion, and Opus felt flat.

@One2xDatalab’s view (paraphrased)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Opus 5.5 each build the same Halloween first-person corridor with paws, pumpkins and costumed monsters.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Halloween FPS corridor, DeepSeek vs Argon vs Opus
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
12 s
Likes
4
Views
147
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.66; Gemini 4 Argon $1.79; Claude Opus 5.5 $5.64.

Related

Posted by @One2xDatalab on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models