AI Coding
3D tennis club with ball physics, Terra vs DeepSeek — GPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Scoreboard2
- GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
- Time
- 47.9 min
- Cost
- $6.13
- Effort Max
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
- Time
- 3 h 11 min
- Cost
- $1.72
- Effort Max
- medium confidence
- Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.
Prompt
3D tennis club with ball physics, Terra vs DeepSeekThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
The poster says Terra led on speed and interactivity, while DeepSeek took over 3 hours but made the cleaner, more cohesive scene.
@sshayahmet’s view (paraphrased)
GPT-6.1 Terra and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, both on max, build a 3D tennis club from scratch with procedural scenery, ball physics and changing conditions.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- 3D tennis club with ball physics, Terra vs DeepSeek
- Category
- 3D & Shaders, Games
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 25 s
- Likes
- 0
- Views
- 37
- Bookmarks
- 0
- Sponsored
- No
Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: GPT-6.1 Terra 47m 54s active, ~$6.13 estimated; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3h 10m 32s active, $1.72 from logs.
Related
Posted by @sshayahmet on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal
