aivs.tv

AI Coding

Ruby Ascent prompt, Opus vs Astra vs Sol — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol

0:00 / 0:25
Posted byTony@EnvolDev · on X
View post on X

29 likes2,332 views

Scoreboard3

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    2 h 33 min
    Cost
    $49.07
  2. GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Time
    52 min
    Cost
    $16.55
  3. GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Time
    42 min
    Cost
    $2.05

Prompt

Ruby Ascent prompt, Opus vs Astra vs SolThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says GPT-6.1 Sol is better than Astra but not quite Opus, while being 24 times cheaper and almost 4 times faster.

@EnvolDev’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol get the same Ruby Ascent prompt, shown with cost and build time.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Ruby Ascent prompt, Opus vs Astra vs Sol
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
25 s
Likes
29
Views
2,332
Bookmarks
2
Sponsored
No

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 SolCompare all 3 modelsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Posted by @EnvolDev on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models