aivs.tv

AI Coding

Cut-open steam locomotive loop, three models — Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

0:00 / 0:18
Top: Claude Opus 5.5
Posted byHavis | Claude Code@HavisT83099 · on X
View post on X

17 likes436 views

Scoreboard3

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    9 min
    Cost
    $1.19
    • Top
  2. GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Time
    —
    Cost
    —
    • Middle
  3. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
    Time
    6 min
    Cost
    $0.15
    • Bottom

Prompt

Cut-open steam locomotive loop, three modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro get the same prompt, one try each: a cut-open steam locomotive seen from the side, fire to steam to pistons to wheels, as a seamless 12-second loop.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Cut-open steam locomotive loop, three models
Mode
One shot
Posted
Video length
18.4 s
Likes
17
Views
436
Bookmarks
10
Sponsored
No

NotesThe poster says Opus has the biggest fire and visible steam flow, Astra the cleanest drawing with a coal tender, and Kimi the most real-looking engine, and asks viewers to pick.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 AstraKimi K3.1 ProCompare all 3 modelsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Posted by @HavisT83099 on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models