Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder 1.0
1 post9 likes1.4K views
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder 1.0 in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
1Same prompt, separate runs
1Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder 1.0 appear together in 1 post on X: 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking (@melvynx). It is part of larger lineups with other models. In @melvynx's 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking, Claude Opus 5.5 was cheaper ($0.54 vs $1.70) and Muse Wonder 1.0 was faster (21 min vs 1 h 34 min), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking@melvynx | Claude Opus 5.5 | 1 h 34 min | $0.54 | — | X post |
| 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking@melvynx | Muse Wonder 1.0 | 21 min | $1.70 | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Prompts shown in the posts
build a 3D lava lamp — @melvynx
Models
Related matchups
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra8 posts · 468.9K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon6 posts · 126.7K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.55 posts · 159.1K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol4 posts · 94.9K viewsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.52 posts · 8.9K viewsClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.52 posts · 4.2K views