Skip to content

AI Coding

Image-to-HTML benchmark, two Flash models vs Opus — MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5

0:00 / 0:28

Posted byJacob Miller@pwnies · on X

Oct 20, 20260 likes293 views

MiniMax M3.1 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Claude Opus 5.5 recreate a sci-fi landing page from an image, one of the author’s harder image-to-HTML benchmarks.

The post, itemised

Oct 20, 2026

Kind: Side-by-side
Task: Image-to-HTML benchmark, two Flash models vs Opus
Category: Web/UI
Mode: Not stated

Posted: Oct 20, 2026
Video length: 28.4 s
Likes: 0
Views: 293
Bookmarks: 0
Sponsored: No

Related

MiniMax M3.1 Flash DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Opus 5.5 Compare all 3 models Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Posted by @pwnies on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models

Hypersonic shock lab CFD, four models with budget: Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Posted by @AlicanKiraz0.

Kaiju wrecking an Austin night race, one shot: Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 4 Argon, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Posted by @RafaCrackYT.

Summer tour through Kraków, four models: Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 4 Argon, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Posted by @RafaCrackYT.