MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMaxCoding model4 posts
Every MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison on aivs.tv: 2 side-by-side posts from X against other models on the same prompt, plus 2 solo runs on classic topics, 2 with cost or time reported. Compare coding ability, cost and speed from real tests.
Muse Wonder 1.0 is faster than MiniMax M3.1 Flash in 1 of 1 post that reports times for both.
| Opponent | Posts | Cheaper | Faster | Author picks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 1 | — | 0/1 | 1–0 |
| Muse Wonder 1.0 | 1 | — | 0/1 | — |
From 4 posts; costs and times as stated by each author, not a controlled benchmark.
Posts
4incl. 2 solo runs
Animated SVG pelican on a bike, MiniMax M3.1 Flash: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (solo run). Video by @leo114119.
Laser frequency-doubling crystal explainer: MiniMax M3.1 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. Video by @SPAC89.
Pagoda island from MiniMax M3.1 Flash, one shot: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (solo run). Video by @ItsmeAjayKV.
Summary
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (MiniMax) appears in 4 posts on aivs.tv, next to Muse Wonder 1.0 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. Tasks: mech assembly and launch, MiniMax vs Muse Wonder, animated SVG pelican on a bike, MiniMax M3.1 Flash, laser frequency-doubling crystal explainer and pagoda island from MiniMax M3.1 Flash, one shot. Reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 10.3 min / 71K tokens in @alohaproxy's mech assembly and launch, MiniMax vs Muse Wonder and 38 min in @SPAC89's laser frequency-doubling crystal explainer. @SPAC89 picks MiniMax M3.1 Flash as the best result in laser frequency-doubling crystal explainer.
What each post reports for MiniMax M3.1 Flash
| Post | Time | Cost | Tokens | Author’s verdict | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mech assembly and launch, MiniMax vs Muse Wonder@alohaproxy | 10.3 min | — | 71,038 | — | X post |
| Animated SVG pelican on a bike, MiniMax M3.1 Flash@leo114119 | — | — | — | — | X post |
| Laser frequency-doubling crystal explainer@SPAC89 | 38 min | — | — | Author’s pick | X post |
| Pagoda island from MiniMax M3.1 Flash, one shot@ItsmeAjayKV | — | — | — | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Who won where
1- Laser frequency-doubling crystal explainerThinks MiniMax takes the win on quality, especially for how little it costs.— the author’s view, @SPAC89 (paraphrased)
Matchups with MiniMax M3.1 Flash
2Spellings we map to MiniMax M3.1 Flash
“M3.1-Flash”, “MiniMax-M3.1-Flash”, “M3.1-Flash-Preview”, “MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview”, “MiniMax M3.1 Flash Preview”