aivs.tv

AI Coding

Alpine benchmark, four budget models — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3

0:00 / 0:25
Posted byTony@EnvolDev · on X
View post on X

13 likes483 views

Scoreboard4

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Author’s pick
    Cost
    —
  2. Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
    Cost
    —
  3. MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
    Cost
    $0.23
  4. Muse Spark 1.3Meta
    Cost
    $0

Prompt

Alpine benchmark, four budget modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 gave the best result of the four; MiniMax is right behind and even cheaper.

@EnvolDev’s view (paraphrased)

The author’s Alpine benchmark, earlier run on frontier models, goes to four budget models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Claude Haiku 5.5, MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. MiniMax cost 23 cents; Muse Spark was free.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Alpine benchmark, four budget models
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
25 s
Likes
13
Views
483
Bookmarks
3
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.23; Muse Spark 1.3 free; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 14x cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 and almost 3x faster.

Related

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Haiku 5.5MiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Compare all 4 modelsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.3MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3

Posted by @EnvolDev on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models