Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash appear together in 9 posts on X: FawnBench running deer, four budget models (@fawnunwrap), GPU showcase website from given image assets, four models (@VulKan42069), lighthouse in a night thunderstorm, three budget models (@alexfacethesun), pixel-art night city with a full moon (@Da7_Tech), alpine benchmark, four budget models (@EnvolDev) and 4 more. 7 of them are part of larger lineups with other models. In @thehypedotnews's submarine chase through a sea-floor city, four flash models, Claude Haiku 5.5 was cheaper ($0.17 vs $0.21) and MiniMax M3.1 Flash was faster (29.4 min vs 35.5 min), as reported in the post. In @fawnunwrap's FawnBench running deer, four budget models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash was cheaper ($0.016 vs $0.081), faster (7.6 min vs 10.3 min) and used fewer tokens (28K tokens vs 205K tokens), as reported in the post. In @noclipepe's pelican driving a flying roadster, MiniMax M3.1 Flash was cheaper ($0.62 vs $0.65) and Claude Haiku 5.5 was faster (30.4 min vs 43.9 min), as reported in the post. In @VulKan42069's GPU showcase website from given image assets, four models, Claude Haiku 5.5 was faster (36.3 min vs 2 h 28 min), as reported in the post.