AI Coding

“This is not CGI” droid butler ad, made in code — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5

0:00 / 0:20
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (top left)
Posted bybenji 💵@benjistacked · on X
View post on X

1 likes59 views

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Claude Opus 5.5 each design their own droid butler and shoot a product ad for it in code, from the same prompt and set to the same jazz track.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
“This is not CGI” droid butler ad, made in code
Category
3D & Shaders
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
20 s
Likes
1
Views
59
Bookmarks
0
Sponsored
No

NotesThe post quotes a droid butler ad by @make_robot_go that inspired the test. No winner named.

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 59 min, $0; MiniMax M3.1 Flash 33 min, $0; Claude Opus 5.5 64 min, $12.80.

Related

Posted by @benjistacked on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models