aivs.tv

AI Coding

Fart-powered backflip, three models — Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

0:00 / 0:10
Posted byLatent Operator@LatentOperatorX · on X
View post on X

12 likes4,429 views

Scoreboard3

  1. Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Time
    9.6 min
    Cost
    $1.21
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    8.7 min
    Cost
    $0.05
    • medium confidence
    • Named "DeepSeek V4.1" in the post text; the on-screen label reads DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  3. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
    Time
    12.7 min
    Cost
    $0.24

Prompt

Fart-powered backflip, three modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says DeepSeek almost matched Claude Opus 5.5 for 24 times less, and that Kimi K3.1 Pro disappoints again.

@LatentOperatorX’s view (paraphrased)

Claude Opus 5.5, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Kimi K3.1 Pro get the same prompt for a fart-powered backflip; cost, time and tokens are shown on screen.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Fart-powered backflip, three models
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
10 s
Likes
12
Views
4,429
Bookmarks
3
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs shown on screen: Claude Opus 5.5 $1.21, 9 min 35 s; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.05, 8 min 41 s; Kimi K3.1 Pro $0.24, 12 min 39 s.

Related

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Kimi K3.1 ProCompare all 3 modelsClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Posted by @LatentOperatorX on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models