DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Kimi K3.1 Pro appear together in 15 posts on X: satellite Mesh Blackout benchmark, four models in OpenCode (@AlicanKiraz0), Blender axe, five models side by side (@sshayahmet), fart-powered backflip, three models (@LatentOperatorX), code-only 3D campfire, three models (@EvoLinkAi), erupting 3D volcano, Kimi K3.1 Pro and 3 others (@criscxuan) and 10 more. 10 of them are part of larger lineups with other models. The 5 most-viewed examples: In @AlicanKiraz0's ant colony foraging benchmark, four models, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.172 vs $3.001), as reported in the post. In @sakatayasha's Three.js Egyptian temple complex at dawn, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was faster (32 min vs 41 min), as reported in the post. In @LatentOperatorX's fart-powered backflip, three models, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.05 vs $0.24) and faster (8.7 min vs 12.7 min), as reported in the post. In @EnvolDev's floatplane over a fjord, three models, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.49 vs $24.12) and Kimi K3.1 Pro was faster (1 h 12 min vs 1 h 22 min), as reported in the post. In @AlicanKiraz0's satellite Mesh Blackout benchmark, four models in OpenCode, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.47 vs $0.85) and faster (18.7 min vs 20.9 min), as reported in the post. The table below lists all 12 posts with numbers for both.