Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
2 posts464 likes86.9K views
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon in real side-by-side tests: 2 posts from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
2
Same prompt, separate runs
2Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon appear together in 2 posts on X: jelly Rubik's cube (@0xRhinoX) and night train 3D scene (@EnvolDev). All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @0xRhinoX's jelly Rubik's cube, Gemini 4 Argon was cheaper ($0.55 vs $7.36) and faster (33 min vs 1 h 03 min), as reported in the post. According to @0xRhinoX, only Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jelly. (The author’s view.)
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Author’s verdict | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelly Rubik's cube@0xRhinoX | Gemini 4 Argon | 33 min | $0.55 | — | — | X post |
| Jelly Rubik's cube@0xRhinoX | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 1 h 03 min | $7.36 | — | Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jelly | X post |
| Night train 3D scene@EnvolDev | Gemini 4 Argon | — | — | — | — | X post |
| Night train 3D scene@EnvolDev | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | — | — | — | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Who won where
1- Jelly Rubik's cubeOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jelly.— the author’s view, @0xRhinoX (paraphrased)
Prompts shown in the posts
Build a night train. — @EnvolDev
Models
Related matchups
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon6 posts · 126.7K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.54 posts · 155.7K viewsGemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra4 posts · 107.8K viewsClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra3 posts · 154.8K viewsClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol2 posts · 166.1K viewsGemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol2 posts · 18.9K views