Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

3 posts845 likes154.8K views

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in real side-by-side tests: 3 posts from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.

Posts

3

Same prompt, separate runs

1

Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.

Summary

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra appear together in 3 posts on X: jelly Rubik's cube (@0xRhinoX), night train 3D scene (@EnvolDev) and Mario Kart-style racing game (@LuminaBench). All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @0xRhinoX's jelly Rubik's cube, GPT-6 Astra was cheaper ($4.27 vs $7.36) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 was faster (1 h 03 min vs 1 h 14 min), as reported in the post. According to @0xRhinoX, only Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jelly. (The author’s view.) According to @LuminaBench, Claude Sonnet 5.5 looks the best of the four. (The author’s view.)

What each post reports

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostModelTimeCostTokensAuthor’s verdictOriginal
Jelly Rubik's cube@0xRhinoXGPT-6 Astra1 h 14 min$4.27——X post
Jelly Rubik's cube@0xRhinoXClaude Sonnet 5.51 h 03 min$7.36—Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 produced translucent jellyX post
Night train 3D scene@EnvolDevClaude Sonnet 5.5————X post
Night train 3D scene@EnvolDevGPT-6 Astra————X post
Mario Kart-style racing game@LuminaBenchClaude Sonnet 5.5———Author’s pickX post
Mario Kart-style racing game@LuminaBenchGPT-6 Astra————X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Who won where

2

Prompts shown in the posts

Build a night train. — @EnvolDev

Models

Related matchups